Arkansas UFC Fighter Bryce Mitchell Sparks Controversy with Hitler Praise on New Podcast
UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell faces backlash for controversial comments on Hitler, the Holocaust, and Elon Musk on podcast.
UFC fighter Bryce Mitchell, an Arkansas native, sparked significant backlash following controversial remarks on his podcast, ArkanSanity. The first episode, hosted by Mitchell and Roli Delgado, featured inflammatory comments about historical figures, including Elon Musk, Adolf Hitler, and the Holocaust. Mitchell’s statements have provoked outrage and criticism across social media and beyond.
During the episode, Mitchell discussed Elon Musk’s controversial gesture of stretching out his hand, suggesting that it resembled the salute used by Nazi soldiers. He then offered an unorthodox view on Adolf Hitler, claiming, “I really don’t think that he was [Heil Hitlering] because I honestly think Hitler was a good guy based on my own research, not my public education indoctrination.” Mitchell went further, saying, “I really do think before Hitler got on meth, he was a guy to go fishing with.”
Mitchell’s comments continued with a disturbing perspective on Hitler’s actions, including his assertion that Hitler fought for his country and sought to “purify it by kicking the greedy Jews out that were destroying his country.” These remarks quickly led to outrage, as they appeared to downplay or justify Hitler’s genocidal actions during World War II.
The UFC has condemned Mitchell’s remarks. Dana White, UFC president, publicly expressed his disgust, stating, “We’re disgusted by it,” following the incident. Mitchell’s controversial comments have sparked wider discussion about the limits of free speech and the responsibility public figures hold when discussing sensitive topics such as the Holocaust and World War II history.
Mitchell’s views and the resulting backlash have placed both him and the UFC under the spotlight, with many questioning whether his statements represent personal beliefs or an attempt to provoke controversy for publicity. The situation also raises concerns about the role of influencers in shaping public opinion and the potential consequences of downplaying historical atrocities.
